Cookie preferences

HundrED uses cookies to enhance user experiences, to personalise content, and analyse our web traffic. By clicking "Accept all" you agree to the use of all cookies, including marketing cookies that may help us deliver personalised marketing content to users. By selecting "Accept necessary" only essential cookies, such as those needed for basic functionality and internal analytics, will be enabled.
For more details, please review our Cookie Policy.
Accept all
Accept necessary
keyboard_backspace Back to HundrED
Lasse Leponiemi

Chairman, The HundrED Foundation
first.last@hundred.org

Cluster Transformation Program (CTP)

place India

Peer-led learning that gives teachers and communities the agency to transform their own schools.

In Punjab's 12,000+ rural government schools, teachers feel powerless, and communities no longer believe the school belongs to them. CTP rebuilds that belief: monthly peer meetings where teachers solve real classroom problems together, and village education meetings where Panchayats and parents take ownership. The result is not just better schools but people who know they can change them.

Overview

Information on this page is provided by the innovator and has not been evaluated by HundrED.

Updated May 2026
Created by

Sanjhi Sikhiya

Web presence

1

Countries
Leaders
Target group
The world is full of education reforms that arrive top-down and leave as quietly as they came. Teachers comply. Communities watch. Nothing sustains. CTP is built on a different premise: the people closest to the school are the most capable of changing it, if they are given real structures for peer learning and shared accountability. When that happens, teachers stop waiting to be told what to do. Panchayats start treating school development as their own responsibility. Parents show up not as spectators but as stakeholders. At the village level, success looks like this: the Gram Panchayat Development Plan includes education as a standing agenda item. The School Management Committee is functioning in its actual role, not just on paper. Community members are contributing resources and effort toward the school on a sustained basis. Enrolment rises because the village has decided the school is worth fighting for. The change we hope to see is a Punjab where this is not a civil society initiative but simply how the education system works. Where every block education officer convenes teacher collectives as a matter of course. Where every Panchayat sees the school as its own responsibility. That is what happened in Patiala district. We are building towards it across all 23 districts of Punjab.

About the innovation

Why did you create this innovation?

In 2018, Sanjhi Sikhiya's founders walked into a government primary school in rural Punjab and saw something data could not capture: resignation. Teachers waiting for instructions from a distant bureaucracy. Parents who had given up on the school. A Sarpanch who assumed it was not his problem.

Punjab's government school system covers 12,000+ rural schools and is deeply centralised. Teachers are overburdened by administrative requirements and receive no training tailored to their specific conditions: single-teacher schools, multi-grade classrooms, villages where children are first-generation learners. Communities are often unaware of their own rights and responsibilities towards the school.

67% of Class III students in Punjab cannot read a Class II text. The problem is not resources. It is the absence of belief that the people closest to the school can change anything.

We created CTP because real change has to start from within. Not with better curriculum or more inspectors. With the belief, in every teacher and every Sarpanch, that they can actually make something different happen.

What does your innovation look like in practice?

CTP works at the cluster level, a group of 10-12 geographically proximate government schools.

Cluster Academic Meetings (CAMs) bring teachers from neighbouring schools together every month. Teachers bring real problems from their classrooms, facilitate peer discussions, try solutions, and report back the following month. Facilitation progressively transfers from Sanjhi Sikhiya to the teachers themselves. A six-dimension Teacher Maturity Matrix tracks each teacher's journey across classroom practice, facilitation, and community engagement.

Gram Sikhiya Sabhas (GSSs) convene the elected village council, parents, and teachers around one question: what does this school need, and what can we do about it? The meeting activates governance structures that already exist in every village but have gone dormant. Panchayat members begin integrating school development into village planning. School Management Committees shift from passive signatories to active champions.

In Bibipur village, enrolment had fallen to 18 students. After the community took ownership through this process, enrolment rose by 177%. No external intervention. The community simply decided the school was worth fighting for.

Over time, we track whether communities are initiating action without prompting: contributing resources, running enrolment drives, raising school needs in Panchayat meetings. That sustained ownership is the outcome we are building towards.

How has it been spreading?

CTP has grown from 2 clusters in 2018 to active work across 4 districts and 37 clusters in Punjab, directly reaching 298 schools, 1,066 teachers, and 24,970 students.

The most significant proof of scalability: 98 clusters in Patiala district now operate entirely without Sanjhi Sikhiya's presence. The district administration observed what CTP produces and embedded the approach into official government operations across the entire district, covering 824 schools, 2,486 teachers, and 72,000+ students. That is scale the government chose, not scale we drove.

In FY 2023-24, including partner-led clusters, CTP reached approximately 1,176 schools and 119,000 students.

Over the next 2-3 years, the goal is to expand into two new Punjab districts, commission rigorous external evaluation of CTP's impact, and build a practitioner community of teachers and officials that sustains peer learning without depending on any single organisation.

If I want to try it, what should I do?

Visit sanjhisikhiya.org or contact Simranpreet Singh Oberoi at simranpreet@sanjhisikhiya.org. Teams interested in adapting CTP can request a facilitated orientation session. The model can be contextualised for any cluster of 8-18 government schools with existing administrative oversight structures.

Implementation steps

Step 1: Map your cluster and identify schools
Define a cluster of 8-18 geographically proximate government schools. Identify the block education officer, cluster head teacher, and School Management Committee members. Understand local dynamics: which teachers are informal leaders, which communities are most engaged or resistant.
Step 2: Convene the first Cluster Academic Meeting
Bring teachers from all cluster schools together for a structured peer session. A facilitator introduces the CAM format: problem-sharing, peer discussion, solution planning. The first meeting is externally facilitated. From meeting two onward, the goal is progressive transfer of facilitation to teachers themselves.
Step 3: Activate the Gram Sikhiya Sabha in each village
Work with the Panchayat, School Management Committee, and parents to convene a village education meeting. The agenda is community-owned: what are this school's challenges, what can we do, who is responsible? Sanjhi Sikhiya facilitates the first two meetings, then progressively steps back as community leaders take the chair.
Step 4: Use the Teacher Maturity Matrix to track and adapt
Apply the six-dimension matrix to each teacher quarterly. Use results to redesign CAMs: if facilitation is weak, build in more practice; if classroom application lags, design sessions around it. The data feeds directly into programme design. It is not a reporting tool.
Step 5: Progress through three phases over 12 months toward independence
CTP runs in three phases. Phase 1 establishes routine. Phase 2 builds ownership among teachers and community leaders. Phase 3 transfers full ownership: meetings run without Sanjhi Sikhiya present, and community institutions sustain the work independently. Contact simranpreet@sanjhisikhiya.org to discuss adaptation.